<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" >
   <channel>
    <atom:link href="http://truthwhys.webnode.com/rss/article-archives.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
      <title><![CDATA[Article Archives - truthwhys.com]]></title>
      <link>http://truthwhys.webnode.com</link>
      <language>en</language>
      <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:22:00 +0100</pubDate>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:22:00 +0100</lastBuildDate>
      <category><![CDATA[Article Archives]]></category>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
      <generator>Rubicus v2.0</generator>
      <managingEditor><![CDATA[dsalter1@charter.net (Dan Salter)]]></managingEditor>
      <webMaster><![CDATA[dsalter1@charter.net (Dan Salter)]]></webMaster>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[Emergents: The Love of God]]></title>
         <link>http://www.truthwhys.com/news/emergents-the-love-of-god/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[&#160;The emergent Christian is difficult to define. The reason for this difficulty is that although the emergent’s conversation is heavily sprinkled with God, love, and even the Bible, the love of God is more than just emphasis among Christian doctrine; it seems to exist as almost the exclusive doctrine amid silence or questioning of all other doctrine. The exclusivity of a doctrine like love shifts focus from the lover to the object of the love. Thus, Christianity, for the emergent, becomes a...]]></description>
         <pubDate>Sun, 10 Apr 2011 08:22:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truthwhys.com/news/emergents-the-love-of-god/</guid>
         <category>Article Archives</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[A Fundamentalist Christian Literary Analysis of the Transformation Narratives in Luke-Acts]]></title>
         <link>http://www.truthwhys.com/news/a-fundamentalist-christian-literary-analysis-of-the-transformation-narratives-in-luke-acts/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[Dissertation - Caren Silvester.docx (191,6 kB)]]></description>
         <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jan 2011 14:12:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truthwhys.com/news/a-fundamentalist-christian-literary-analysis-of-the-transformation-narratives-in-luke-acts/</guid>
         <category>Article Archives</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[Apologetics: Copleston-Russell Debate (1948) - Part 2 The Religious Experience and Moral Argument]]></title>
         <link>http://www.truthwhys.com/news/apologetics-copleston-russell-debate-1948-part-2-the-religious-experience-and-moral-argument/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[
RELIGIOUS EXPERIENCE
C: Let's. Well, perhaps I might say a word about religious experience, and then we can go on to moral experience. I don't regard religious experience as a strict proof of the existence of God, so the character of the discussion changes somewhat, but I think it's true to say that the best explanation of it is the existence of God. By religious experience I don't mean simply feeling good. I mean a loving, but unclear, awareness of some object which irresistibly seems to the...]]></description>
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Nov 2010 16:48:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truthwhys.com/news/apologetics-copleston-russell-debate-1948-part-2-the-religious-experience-and-moral-argument/</guid>
         <category>Article Archives</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[Apologetics: Copleston-Russell Debate (1948) - Part 1 The Argument from Contingency]]></title>
         <link>http://www.truthwhys.com/news/apologetics-copleston-russell-debate-1948-/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[Father Frederick C. Copleston (Jesuit Catholic priest) versus Bertrand Russell (agnostic philosopher, picture right)
This debate was a Third Program broadcast of the British Broadcasting Corporation in 1948. Reprinted in several sources, the following is from Bertrand Russell On God and Religion edited by Al Seckel (Prometheus Books).
A DEBATE ON THE EXISTENCE OF GOD
Bertrand Russell [hereafter R:] and F.C. Copleston [hereafter C:]
C: As we are going to discuss the existence of God, it might...]]></description>
         <pubDate>Wed, 17 Nov 2010 12:38:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truthwhys.com/news/apologetics-copleston-russell-debate-1948-/</guid>
         <category>Article Archives</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[New Perspective on Paul (Part 02)]]></title>
         <link>http://www.truthwhys.com/news/new-perspective-on-paul-part-02-/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[&#160;NPP (Part 2) – Is Wright Wrong?

&#160;
Four major doctrines hold the primary differences between the reformed theology of the majority of current conservative evangelicals (Reformed view) and the New Perspective on Paul (NPP). They are Gospel, Saving Faith, Justification, and Righteousness. We will look at the contrast of each.
&#160;
The Gospel, according to the Reformed view, includes the idea that God accomplished atonement for humankind through the sacrificial, vicarious, and penal...]]></description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:16:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truthwhys.com/news/new-perspective-on-paul-part-02-/</guid>
         <category>Article Archives</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[New Perspective on Paul (Part 01)]]></title>
         <link>http://www.truthwhys.com/news/new-perspective-on-paul-part-01-/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[&#160;In the very early 1500s, Martin Luther, then a Roman Catholic priest, was struggling. He was angry, confused, frustrated, and afraid. He poured his soul into working out his salvation in the goodness that God demanded, but he found that time after time he failed. It was not just the failing that disturbed him. In his failing, he viewed God ready, waiting, and almost eager to pound him with punishment for his sin. He feared God more than the Devil. The words “God’s righteousness” meant...]]></description>
         <pubDate>Fri, 05 Nov 2010 08:16:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truthwhys.com/news/new-perspective-on-paul-part-01-/</guid>
         <category>Article Archives</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[Baptism 2 - Response to Stuart Latimer's Christian Baptism series, sermon 2]]></title>
         <link>http://www.truthwhys.com/news/baptism-2-response-to-stuart-latimers-christian-baptism-series-sermon-2/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[Sermon 2 – Infant Baptism
http://messageshare.com/messages/memberID414/062997aw.mp3
&#160;
Response by Dan Salter:
&#160;
In his second sermon on Christian Baptism, Pastor Latimer’s argument for infant baptism hinges on two major points with which I disagree. His first point concerns paedobaptism’s symmetry with circumcision’s application to infants. Pastor Latimer read from Genesis 17 in which we find that circumcision is indeed the sign (picture) and seal (stamp of guarantee) of the Abrahamic...]]></description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:49:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truthwhys.com/news/baptism-2-response-to-stuart-latimers-christian-baptism-series-sermon-2/</guid>
         <category>Article Archives</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[Baptism 1 - Response to Stuart Latimer's Christian Baptism series, sermon 1]]></title>
         <link>http://www.truthwhys.com/news/baptism-1-response-to-stuart-latimers-christian-baptism-series-sermon-1/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[
Sermon 1 – Sprinkling v. Immersion
http://messageshare.com/messages/memberID414/062297aw.mp3
&nbsp;
Response by Dan Salter:
&nbsp;
I must begin by stating my agreement with Pastor Latimer on the acceptance of an individual’s baptism whether by immersion, sprinkling, or pouring. I differ with Pastor Latimer, however, in that it appears the mode of baptism means somewhat more to him than it does to me. I formerly preferred immersion (while still accepting all modes) because of the picture I...]]></description>
         <pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 11:47:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truthwhys.com/news/baptism-1-response-to-stuart-latimers-christian-baptism-series-sermon-1/</guid>
         <category>Article Archives</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[Faith Electionism (Part 1) - FE's Satisfaction to Calvinism's and Arminian's Problems]]></title>
         <link>http://www.truthwhys.com/news/faith-electionism/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[  
&#160;
 
 
 

Faith Electionism is the view that God elects based on the faith response to his revelatory enlightenment. I came to this conclusion based partly on what I considered the failure to satisfy in the arguments of both Calvinism and Arminianism.
Calvinism’s problems
(1) (Geisler’s argument) God’s relationship with his creation cannot be a pure love relationship if God must coerce the creature’s love. God intended with creation to establish a perfect and everlasting love...]]></description>
         <pubDate>Sun, 01 Aug 2010 12:53:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truthwhys.com/news/faith-electionism/</guid>
         <category>Article Archives</category>
      </item>
      <item>
         <title><![CDATA[Church Constitution - New Covenant Chapel]]></title>
         <link>http://www.truthwhys.com/news/new/</link>
         <description><![CDATA[


&#160;



Constitution
New Covenant Chapel
Greenville, SC
&#160;
Preamble
&#160;
Recognizing God’s grace by which we live here and eternally and desiring to glorify God through relationship with him and with others of biblical and Christian faith, in praise of our great God, Lord Christ, and Holy Spirit, we establish this constitution for the framework of operation of our church. &#160;
&#160;
&#160;
Article I – Name, Location, and Purpose
&#160;
Section 1: Name
This organization shall be...]]></description>
         <pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 12:26:00 +0100</pubDate>
         <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.truthwhys.com/news/new/</guid>
         <category>Article Archives</category>
      </item>
   </channel>
</rss>
